Psychological safety is a shared belief among members of a team or group that it is safe to take interpersonal risks—such as speaking up with ideas, asking questions, admitting mistakes, or challenging the status quo—without fear of embarrassment, rejection, or punishment. Coined by Harvard Business School professor Amy Edmondson in 1999, the concept has become a cornerstone of effective team dynamics, particularly in organizational behavior and leadership studies.
Psychological safety fosters open communication, innovation, learning, and resilience, and is especially important in high-stakes or collaborative environments such as healthcare, tech, education, and startups.
Psychological safety directly influences team performance, employee engagement, and organizational learning. According to Google’s internal research project Aristotle, psychological safety was the most important factor in high-performing teams. Without it, individuals may stay silent, suppress concerns, or withhold ideas—leading to missed opportunities, poor decisions, and diminished morale. Psychological safety also buffers against workplace stress and burnout by creating environments where employees feel seen, heard, and supported.
In industries where innovation, safety, or collaboration are critical (e.g., tech, medicine, aviation), psychological safety isn’t just nice to have—it’s essential.
Psychological safety is a foundational element of healthy, high-performing teams. When people feel safe to speak up, ask questions, and take risks without fear of being shamed or ignored, collaboration thrives and innovation follows. Coined by Amy Edmondson and validated by companies like Google, the concept has moved from academic theory to core business practice. It underpins successful leadership, team learning, and organizational agility. By actively cultivating psychological safety, organizations not only boost performance but also build a culture of trust, resilience, and inclusion.
No. Psychological safety is not about avoiding conflict or always being agreeable. It’s about creating a climate where people feel safe to be honest and authentic, even when disagreeing.
By actively listening, showing vulnerability, encouraging input from all team members, and responding with curiosity—not judgment—to mistakes or dissent.
Signs include silence in meetings, lack of innovation, fear of blame, avoidance of feedback, or dominance by a few voices while others withdraw.
Surveys such as Edmondson’s 7-question team scale can assess it. Questions explore comfort in sharing ideas, making mistakes, or asking for help.
Without physical cues and informal interactions, remote workers may feel isolated or hesitant to speak up. Intentional communication and trust-building are crucial in these settings.
Build trust 4x faster.
Collect and embed video testimonials from your customers with ease.